Scaling Your Strategy: When and How to Increase Size
Growing your position size is tempting when things are going well. But scale too fast and you can blow up a winning strategy. Here is how to do it right.
You've been trading for a few months. Your strategy is working. The account is growing. A thought creeps in: "Maybe I should trade bigger."
This is one of the most dangerous moments in a trader's journey.
Scaling up is inevitable if you want to grow. But how you do it matters more than when you do it. Scale too fast, and a normal drawdown wipes out months of gains. Scale incorrectly, and the psychology of bigger losses throws off your whole system.
Let's talk about how to grow your size without growing your risk of blowing up.
The Danger of Scaling Too Fast
When you're trading 1 contract, a $500 loss is annoying but manageable. When you're trading 5 contracts, that same trade is a $2,500 loss. Same strategy, same percentage risk—but the dollar amount hits differently.
Most traders underestimate how much size affects psychology.
A drawdown you could handle at 1 contract becomes unbearable at 5. You start intervening, cutting trades early, skipping signals. The edge that worked at small size disappears because you can't execute it at bigger size.
This is why scaling too fast kills more accounts than scaling too slow.
The Math of Position Scaling
Before scaling, understand the relationship between size, drawdown, and survival.
Fixed Dollar Risk
If you always risk $200 per trade, your risk stays constant as your account grows. At $10,000 account, $200 is 2%. At $20,000, it's 1%. At $5,000, it's 4%.
Problem: Your risk percentage changes with account size. A losing streak when your account is smaller hits harder percentage-wise.
Fixed Percentage Risk
If you always risk 2% per trade, your dollar risk scales with your account. At $10,000, that's $200. At $20,000, it's $400.
Better: Your risk stays proportional to what you have. Drawdowns feel consistent regardless of account size.
The Right Way to Think About It
Here's the framework:
- Define your maximum acceptable drawdown (say, 20%)
- Determine how many consecutive losses your strategy might see (say, 8)
- Size each trade so 8 losses equals about half your max drawdown (10%)
- This gives you 1.25% risk per trade
At $10,000, that's $125 risk per trade. At $20,000, it's $250.
You're scaling automatically, but you're doing it in proportion to your cushion, not your ambition.
When to Consider Increasing Size
There's no magic moment. But here are reasonable milestones:
Account Growth Thresholds
Consider size increases at natural breakpoints:
- Account up 50%: Consider a modest increase
- Account up 100%: Consider scaling to maintain percentage risk
- Account up 200%: Significant increases become reasonable
Don't increase size just because you've had a good week. Account growth should be substantial and sustained.
Confidence in Edge
Size increases make sense when:
- You have at least 100+ trades with consistent results
- Your strategy has survived different market conditions
- You understand why it works, not just that it works
- Your max drawdown has been within expected bounds
If you've only traded for a month or two, you don't have enough data yet. Wait.
Psychological Readiness
Can you handle the bigger numbers? Genuinely?
Try this test: Paper trade at the larger size for 20-30 trades. Did the bigger dollar amounts affect your decision-making? Were you nervous? Did you want to interfere?
If you can't handle the size on paper, you definitely can't handle it with real money.
How to Scale: Gradual Increases
Don't double your size overnight. Increase gradually.
The 20% Rule
Increase size by no more than 20-25% at a time. If you're trading 2 contracts, go to 2.5 (round as needed), not 4.
This gives you time to adjust psychologically while limiting additional risk exposure.
Implement in Stages
Stage 1 (first 20 trades at new size): Monitor closely. How do losses feel? Are you executing cleanly?
Stage 2 (next 30 trades): If Stage 1 went well, continue. If not, drop back down.
Stage 3 (ongoing): If 50 trades at new size feel comfortable, this is your new normal.
Document Everything
Track your trading metrics before and after size changes:
- Win rate
- Average win/loss
- Max drawdown
- Psychological state
If metrics degrade after sizing up, that's a signal. Maybe you're not ready, or maybe the larger size is affecting execution.
Drawdown-Based Scaling Rules
Here's a more sophisticated approach: let drawdowns determine your size.
The Concept
When your account is at or near equity highs, trade full size. When in drawdown, reduce size. This preserves capital during rough patches and captures gains when things are working.
Simple Implementation
- At equity high: 100% size
- 5% drawdown: 80% size
- 10% drawdown: 60% size
- 15% drawdown: 40% size
- 20%+ drawdown: 25% size or pause trading
As you recover, scale back up gradually. Don't immediately jump to full size the moment you're back at highs.
Why This Works
During drawdowns, either:
- Your strategy is experiencing normal variance (and smaller size reduces damage)
- Market conditions have changed (and smaller size limits losses while you figure it out)
Either way, reduced size is the right move.
Psychological Challenges of Bigger Size
Bigger Losses Feel Bigger
A $200 loss at 1 contract becomes a $1,000 loss at 5 contracts. Same percentage, very different feeling.
Prepare yourself mentally. A $1,000 loss isn't a disaster—it's 2% of a $50,000 account. But if you're used to seeing $200 losses, that $1,000 can trigger panic.
Winners Don't Feel Proportionally Bigger
Strangely, wins don't always feel as good at larger size. The $1,000 winner might feel like "that's what I should be making" rather than celebrating. But the $1,000 loser feels like a punch.
This asymmetry is normal. Be aware of it.
The Temptation to Over-Manage
When more money is at stake, you might:
- Take profits too early
- Move stops to breakeven too quickly
- Skip trades because "the risk feels too big"
All of these behaviors degrade your strategy. If you find yourself doing them, you've sized up too fast.
Common Scaling Mistakes
Scaling After a Win Streak
You're up 20% in two weeks. Time to double your size, right?
Wrong. Win streaks are often followed by mean reversion. If you scale up at the peak, you experience your normal drawdown at larger size. It hurts more, and you often scale back down at the worst moment—the bottom.
Scale up slowly, not reactively.
Scaling During a Losing Streak
"I need to make back my losses faster."
This is revenge trading with extra steps. If you increase size during a drawdown, normal variance can blow up your account. Wait until you're back at or near equity highs.
Ignoring the Numbers
You feel ready to trade bigger. But your metrics say your strategy hasn't proven itself.
Trust the numbers, not your feelings. Feelings want to be right. Numbers just are what they are.
Comparing to Others
Someone on Twitter is trading 50 contracts. You're trading 2. Must be time to size up.
Their account size, risk tolerance, and experience are different from yours. Comparison is irrelevant. Focus on your own growth path.
A Sensible Scaling Plan
Here's a template you can adapt:
Starting point: Define your initial size based on 1-2% risk per trade.
First milestone: After 100 trades with positive expectancy and max drawdown within tolerance, consider a 20% size increase.
Scaling triggers: Every 50% account growth (sustained, not just a peak), evaluate another 20% size increase.
Reduction triggers: Any time you enter 10% drawdown, cut size by 30-40%. Scale back up gradually as you recover.
Psychology checks: Every 50 trades at new size, honestly assess: Are you comfortable? Are you executing the strategy as designed?
The Long Game
The goal isn't to trade as big as possible as fast as possible. The goal is to trade appropriately for your account, psychology, and strategy.
A trader who slowly scales from 1 to 10 contracts over two years, maintaining discipline the whole way, will outperform the trader who jumped to 10 contracts immediately and blew up.
Patience in scaling is an edge. The market will be here tomorrow. Your job is to make sure you are too.
Grow your size like you'd grow any valuable thing: carefully, deliberately, and with respect for what you're building.
Related Articles
Understanding Slippage and Order Execution
Slippage is the gap between expected and actual fill prices. Learn what causes it, how to minimize it, and what to realistically expect from your automated trades.
Trading Around News Events: A Survival Guide
Major economic releases can make or break your trading day. Learn how to handle FOMC, NFP, CPI, and other market-moving events in your automation.
Questions about this article? hi@algobread.com